Photographs tell a visual story whether it be artistic, snap shots of family, formal portraits, fashion or photojournalism. In my mind it is the photojournalism photos that so often can be political, but this is not to say that other photographs can’t be political. A snapshot of a family picnicking at a nice park tells a story in terms of the way they dress, the food they eat, the feeling of happiness or unhappiness, the state of the park in which they picnic – this together may be political when comparing with another family in another country in terms of +/- wealth , +/- a different culture or +/- surrounding violence for instance.
Reference:
Photographers: http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://apphotnum.free.fr/images/cartier-bresson05.jpg&imgrefurl=http://apphotnum.free.fr/N2BE43.html&h=500&w=336&sz=48&tbnid=oFm-ZL0Q3Q5_IM:&tbnh=130&tbnw=87&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhenri%2Bcartier-bresson%2Bphotographer&hl=en&usg=__JhReoUPBh0KVD-V9EHMbYNucz5M=&ei=L0bjS6u0K8-LkAWh_fj6Dw&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=3&ct=image&ved=0CCkQ9QEwAg

Hi Ginette
ReplyDeleteAs usual, you have thought through the questions and your responses show solid analysis and reflection. I agree that documentary/photojournalistic images may be more overtly political, but all images are in that they are presenting a set of values, as you say. The Bennetton ads are really good for discussion - you have interesting questions related to them. You might be interested in looking at the Cartier Bresson link that I posted on the main blog. Well done - consistent and thoughtful.